legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re C.P. CA5
A.G. (mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s orders declaring her five daughters dependents of the juvenile court pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (b) and (g), removing them from her custody pursuant to section 361, subdivision (c), and granting her family reunification services. On appeal, mother contends the jurisdictional findings and removal order are not supported by substantial evidence. She also contends the juvenile court erred in finding that active efforts were made to provide remedial services and rehabilitative programs designed to prevent the breakup of the Indian family, as required by the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), 25 United States Code section 1901 et seq. We reject mother’s contentions and affirm the juvenile court’s findings and orders.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale