legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Juliana P. CA2/4
Mother, Gillian P., appeals from the juvenile court order terminating her parental rights to her then two–year–old daughter, Juliana P. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26.) Mother contends the trial court erred in prematurely setting a selection and implementation hearing, and in summarily denying her section 388 petition seeking reunification services because, although her whereabouts were unknown at the start of the dependency process and at the time the selection and implementation hearing was set, she appeared in court on the date set for that hearing. Mother claims the court erred, as a matter of law, in prematurely setting the section 366.26 hearing, and abused its discretion by failing later to correct that legal error.
We conclude that the juvenile court erred, and that the order terminating parental rights must be reversed. We will remand the matter to the juvenile court with options as to how the court may proceed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale