In re G.K. CA4/2
Defendant and appellant C.Y. (Father) is the father of G.K., who was 18 months old at the time of the challenged order. Father appeals from the court’s order that G.K. remain placed in a foster home instead of moving him to the paternal aunt’s home in Tennessee. The aunt came forward when G.K. was one year old and G.K. had been in the foster home since he was one month old. At that time, the mother’s reunification services had not yet been terminated; Father did not receive reunification services. Father argues the court erred when it applied a generalized best interest standard and failed to consider the factors set forth in Welfare and Institutions Code section 361.3.
After looking at the factors set forth in section 361.3, which includes a consideration of G.K.’s best interest, we affirm the court’s ruling.
Comments on In re G.K. CA4/2