P. v. Bonilla CA6
Following a jury trial, defendant Abelino Bonilla was found guilty of possession for sale of a controlled substance, namely methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378) and unauthorized entry into a dwelling (Pen. Code, § 602.5, subd. (a)) . The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and granted probation.
On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erroneously found that his inculpatory statements were not obtained in violation of his Miranda rights (see Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 (Miranda)). He asserts that the trial court impermissibly prevented the jury from considering relevant evidence surrounding his “confession,” which violated his due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Defendant also maintains that there were multiple instances of ineffective assistance of counsel.
Since we discern no error, we will affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Bonilla CA6