In re Rodrick W. CA1/3
Rodrick W. appeals from a dispositional order after the juvenile court sustained allegations of second degree robbery, unlawful driving or taking of a vehicle and receiving stolen property. Rodrick contends the evidence was insufficient to prove robbery or the unlawful driving or taking of a vehicle. He alternatively argues he was improperly found to have received stolen property based on the same conduct underlying the juvenile court’s true finding on the unlawful driving or taking a vehicle count. His assertions are meritless, so we affirm.
Comments on In re Rodrick W. CA1/3