Boyd v. Boyd CA1/3
Plaintiff David Boyd sued his brother William for some $700,000 allegedly owed on oral loan agreements dating back to at least 1981. Following a defense judgment, David contends the trial court erred when it treated William’s motions for directed verdict and nonsuit as a motion for judgment under Code of Civil Procedure section 638.1 and found the action barred by various affirmative defenses. The court’s ruling was procedurally sound and David’s failure to address its dispositive rulings on William’s equitable defenses in his opening brief forfeits any challenge to those rulings on appeal. We therefore affirm.
Comments on Boyd v. Boyd CA1/3