Gustavo P. v. Superior Court CA1/2
Ashley M. (Mother) and Gustavo P. (Father) separately petition this court for extraordinary relief from dependency court orders terminating reunification services as to their child H.P. (Minor) and setting a hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 to select a permanent plan for the child. Mother and Father argue that they are entitled to additional reunification services, with Mother claiming that, contrary to the court’s determination, she had made substantive progress in the services offered to her and there was a substantial likelihood that Minor could be returned to her care by the 12-month review, and Father claiming that he was denied reasonable services. We conclude that neither parent has shown that the dependency court abused its discretion in terminating reunification services and setting the section 366.26 hearing, and therefore we shall affirm.
Comments on Gustavo P. v. Superior Court CA1/2