Gillian v. Taylor
Plaintiff sued defendant for malicious prosecution based on his legal representation of Plaintiff's former patient, Gail Conway-Lenz, on whom Plaintiff had performed breast augmentation surgery. The trial court concluded defendant had probable cause to file and prosecute an action against Plaintiff for medical malpractice and to ultimately try that action on a theory of medical battery, and therefore malicious prosecution was not established. On appeal from the judgment entered in defendant’s favor, Plaintiff argues the trial court erred. Court affirmed the judgment.
Comments on Gillian v. Taylor