P. v. Hammond CA2/7
Kenneth Hammond and Eddie Garlin appeal from judgments entered after a jury convicted them of conspiracy to commit robbery and found not true an accompanying special allegation that the crime had been committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang. A companion charge of robbery was dismissed after the jury could not reach a unanimous verdict. Hammond and Garlin contend on appeal there was insufficient evidence apart from their own statements to support the conspiracy conviction in violation of the corpus delicti rule and the trial court abused its discretion by denying their motion to bifurcate trial on the gang allegation. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Hammond CA2/7