P. v. Tye CA4/3
Defendant Matthew Tye appeals from a postjudgment order denying his petition for court approval of his girlfriend to accompany him and to be his adult monitor, while in the presence of minors, as mandated by his probation conditions. Defendant primarily contends the court was required to approve his girlfriend. We disagree.
Defendant also raises a host of other contentions regarding the conduct of the hearing on the petition and the probation conditions at issue. These contentions are (a) moot, (b) meritless, (c) waived, or (d) not subject to review in this appeal. Thus, we will decline to address some of them, reject the others, and affirm the challenged order.
Comments on P. v. Tye CA4/3