In re J.D. CA3
J.D. (the minor) appeals from the juvenile court’s order revoking his probation and committing him to the Department of Juvenile Facilities (DJF). (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 800.) The minor contends: (1) The court erred by finding he had failed to complete a required alcohol and drug assessment, because his failure to do so was not willful. (2) The court erred by finding he had committed an offense under Penal Code section 288, subdivision (a). His purported confession was uncorroborated, in violation of the corpus delicti rule. But even if that rule does not apply, there was no admissible evidence of the offense because the purported recording of his confession was not properly authenticated.
Comments on In re J.D. CA3