P. v. Mitchell CA1/2
A jury convicted Justin Ralph Mitchell of two residential burglaries and a host of other theft-related and drug-related charges. In this appeal, Mitchell challenges the jury instructions in several respects. We find no error in the trial court’s decision to give CALCRIM No. 373 (Other Perpetrator) or CALCRIM No. 370 (Motive), and we find harmless error in the trial court’s failure to give an instruction on accomplice testimony and in its inadvertent reading of CALCRIM No. 361. We accordingly affirm.
Comments on P. v. Mitchell CA1/2