In re D.D. CA1/4
Appellant D.D. appeals from the juvenile court’s dispositional order arguing the court failed to determine the maximum term of confinement and to calculate his custody credits. Both parties agree the matter must be remanded. Appellant further argues on remand the court cannot impose an aggregated sentence because appellant was not provided sufficient notice. We remand to the juvenile court to specify the maximum period of confinement, exercising its discretion whether to impose an aggregated term, and to calculate appellant’s custody credits.
Comments on In re D.D. CA1/4