legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Farfan CA2/2
Josue Farfan and his brother Edgar Farfan (defendants) were convicted by jury of murder (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a)), kidnapping for robbery (§ 209, subd. (b)(1)) and second degree robbery (§ 211). The jury found true the special circumstances allegation that the murder was committed while the defendants were engaged in the commission of a robbery. (§ 190.2, subd. (17).) The trial court sentenced both defendants to life in prison without the possibility of parole (LWOP) plus five years for the robbery conviction. The court stayed the sentence for the kidnapping conviction pursuant to section 654.
Defendants appeal from the judgment of conviction. Josue contends the trial court erred in compelling his wife, Jennifer Medina to testify and also erred in admitting Edgar’s pretrial statement to police. Josue also contends the abstract of judgment must be corrected to match the trial court’s oral pronouncement of sentence.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale