Tuazon v. Southern California Permanente Medical G
Nestor C. Tuazon filed a complaint against his former employer, respondent Southern California Permanente Medical Group, alleging age discrimination and retaliation in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), Gov. Code § 12900 et seq., and wrongful termination in violation of public policy. Respondent moved for summary judgment, arguing that appellant had failed to make a prima facie case of discrimination and retaliation, and that even if he did, respondent had presented legitimate, nondiscriminatory, nonretaliatory reasons for the adverse employment action. The trial court granted the summary judgment motion and dismissed the complaint. Appellant contends the trial court erred, arguing he produced evidence sufficient to meet his burden to make a prima facie case.
Comments on Tuazon v. Southern California Permanente Medical G