P. v. Willard CA2/1
Defendant and appellant Jamie Willard challenges his convictions on two counts of attempted murder. He contends that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to object to opinion testimony from a police witness regarding the reliability of witness perception and memory shortly after a traumatic event. In addition, Willard contends that he is eligible for resentencing pursuant to Senate Bill No. 620 (2017-2018 Reg. Sess.) (Senate Bill No. 620), which became effective after Willard’s conviction, and which gives trial courts the discretion to strike certain firearm enhancements during sentencing. We affirm Willard’s convictions but remand the case for resentencing regarding the firearm enhancements.
Comments on P. v. Willard CA2/1