legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re I.V. CA2/1
In this dependency case (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300 et seq.), Y.S. (Mother) appeals from the dispositional order, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the removal of her then five-year-old son I.V. from her custody after the juvenile court sustained a supplemental dependency petition under section 387. We agree with Mother that the removal order is not supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, we reverse this portion of the disposition order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale