legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Eib v. Sizzler Restaurants CA3
Appellants Brandon Eib, Michael Brunson, and Jared Brown (Appellants) sued Sizzler USA Restaurants, Inc., C Food Concepts, Inc., and coworker Rebekah Johnson (Respondents) claiming they were subjected to sexual harassment, retaliation, negligent supervisions/retention, assault, battery, and wrongful termination while employed at a Sizzler restaurant in Sacramento.
After some discovery and an unsuccessful mediation, Respondents made offers of compromise to each of the appellants pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 998 which offers included an agreement that Respondents would pay Appellants’ attorney fees incurred prior to October 29, 2013, in an amount to be agreed upon or, failing an agreement, in an amount to be determined by the court. Appellants appeal contending the trial court arbitrarily reduced counsels’ hourly rates and time, arbitrarily denied Appellants’ expert witness fees, and, the request being unopposed, should have granted a 1.2 lodestar multiplier.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale