legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Siggard v. Hudack CA4/2
Plaintiff and appellant Wayne Siggard sued defendants and respondents Larry J. Hudack and Marianne S. Hudack, and others for malicious prosecution and conspiracy. Larry and Marianne (collectively, the Hudacks) moved the trial court to strike Siggard’s complaint as a strategic lawsuit against public participation (anti-SLAPP). (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16.) The trial court granted the motion. Siggard contends the trial court erred because Siggard demonstrated a probability of prevailing. We affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale