legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Cisneros CA5
Appellant Matthew Cisneros appeals following his sentencing after pleading no contest to one count of voluntary manslaughter (Pen. Code , § 192, subd. (a)), with enhancements for using a firearm (§ 12022.5, subd. (a)) and committing the offense for the benefit of a criminal street gang (§ 186.22, subd. (b)(1)(C)). Cisneros contends his plea bargain was faulty because he could not properly waive his right to a parole hearing under section 3051. He further contends the trial court abused its discretion in issuing the maximum restitution fines available. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale