Larry S. v. Sup. Ct.
In this petition for extraordinary relief pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 38.1, Father contends that the juvenile court’s order setting a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 permanency planning hearing for his 16-year-old daughter and the court’s finding that the family had received adequate reunification services were not supported by substantial evidence. Father further contends that the court used an erroneous standard of proof.
Court denied the petition.
Comments on Larry S. v. Sup. Ct.