legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Albert v. Seal CA4/3
This is the third of three appeals arising out of an omnibus complaint (Orange County Superior Court case No. 30-2014-00738725) filed by attorney Lenore Albert against multiple persons and entities she alleges have defamed her. We call that complaint and the ensuing litigation the “725 action.” This appeal concerns but a single defendant in the 725 action, attorney David Seal.
By way of background, it was not until Albert’s second amended complaint in the 725 action that Seal was even mentioned by name. In the wake of that second amended complaint Seal brought an anti-SLAPP motion against Albert, the substance of which we discuss in what we call the Hannah appeal, G052748. In that appeal we affirm the trial court’s grant of Seal’s anti-SLAPP motion against Albert, with the sole exception of her claims he defamed her by telling people she was having sex with family members, a particular individual, and her dog.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale