In re J.M. CA3
M.M., father of the minors, appeals from the juvenile court’s order continuing the minors in out-of-home placement. Father contends there was insufficient evidence to support the court’s finding of detriment pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.21, subdivision (e) (further unspecified statutory references are to this code). The El Dorado County Health and Human Services Agency (Agency) concedes the issue in a letter that offers no explanation for its position. We reject the Agency’s concession and affirm the juvenile court’s order.
Comments on In re J.M. CA3