legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re H.S. CA4/2
J.S. (father of H.S.; hereinafter Father-S), J.R. (father of H.R.; hereinafter Father-R), and V.S. (sister of Father-S, aunt to H.S. & great-aunt to H.R.; hereinafter Aunt) appeal the denial of Aunt’s Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petitions and relative placement preference motion filed pursuant to section 361.3.
A section 300 petition was filed against T.E. (Mother), Father-R and Father-S (collectively, Fathers) for H.S. and H.R. (collectively, the Children) for substance abuse and abandonment. Just prior to the section 366.26 hearing, Aunt filed section 388 petitions and a section 361.3 motion arguing that she was entitled to relative placement preference. Her section 388 petitions and motion pursuant to section 361.3 were denied and the Children remained in the care of their de facto parents who intended to adopt them. The parental rights of Fathers and Mother were terminated at the section 366.26 hearing and the Children were freed for adoption.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale