P. v. Robinson CA4/3
Appellant Jamaika Quatel Robinson was convicted of multiple crimes with enhancements for personally using a firearm and being out on bail in another case. On appeal, he contends: 1) The trial court erred in failing to stay his sentence for the bail enhancement; 2) the court miscalculated his custody credits; and 3) the case must be remanded to allow the court to decide whether to dismiss the firearm enhancements. Respondent agrees with all three of these contentions. The only disputed issue is whether the failure to stay the bail enhancement was prejudicial to appellant. We think not. Therefore, while we remand for the trial court to address appellant’s latter two claims, we affirm the judgment in all respects.
Comments on P. v. Robinson CA4/3