legal news


Register | Forgot Password

K.D. v. Superior Court CA6
Petitioner K.D. (mother) challenges the juvenile court’s order terminating reunification services and setting a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 hearing to select a permanent plan for her two-year-old daughter, B.M. In her pro per petition, she contends that she should be “reconsidered” for reunification services because she is now in a treatment facility, “at a stable point in my sobriety,” taking parenting classes, attending weekly individual counseling, and “attending all scheduled visitation with my newborn 3x weekly.” She asserts that she has a “great relationship” with her children, is “on the waitlist for Pueblo Delmar,” and is “currently doing wonderful.” Mother attaches to her January 12, 2018 petition a January 11, 2018 letter from Janus, a residential substance abuse treatment program, stating that mother entered treatment on January 5, 2018. The letter verifies that mother has “begun” counseling and parenting classes.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale