P. v. Hohenegger CA1/5
Martin Hohenegger appeals following jury verdicts convicting him of two counts of first degree murder and finding him legally sane at the time of the murders. He raises numerous challenges to the guilt proceedings: the trial court inadequately responded to jury questions, the court committed instructional errors, evidence of an uncharged offense was improperly admitted, and the prosecutor committed misconduct during closing arguments. We reject these challenges. We agree with appellant’s claims regarding an error in the abstract of judgment and a remand of firearm enhancements pursuant to recent legislation, and otherwise affirm.
Comments on P. v. Hohenegger CA1/5