legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re K.M. CA4/2
Defendant and appellant, C.M. (Mother), appeals the judgment terminating parental rights to her son, K.M. (born in 2015), after the juvenile court denied her Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petition seeking reinstatement of reunification services and vacating the section 366.26 hearing. Mother contends the court abused its discretion in denying her section 388 petition because she demonstrated changed circumstances, and granting the petition was in K.M.’s best interest. We disagree and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale