In re D.M. CA4/2
Defendant and appellant, P.M. (mother), challenges the court’s orders (1) refusing to return her daughter, D.M., to her care or reinstate reunification services, and (2) terminating her parental rights over D.M. Mother contends the court erred in denying her petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 because she showed a change of circumstances, and that a return to her care or renewed reunification services promoted D.M.’s best interests. Alternatively, mother argues, the court should have applied the beneficial parent-child relationship exception to adoption. We reject both challenges and affirm the orders.
Comments on In re D.M. CA4/2