P. v. Meza CA2/2
Defendant and appellant Oscar Meza (defendant) appeals from the judgment entered against him, contending that accomplice testimony was insufficiently corroborated, that the trial court erred in staying, rather than striking, a 10-year gang enhancement, that the court erred in refusing to award any presentence custody credit, and that the matter should be remanded for resentencing under the recently amended Penal Code section 12022.53, subdivision (h). Finding that defendant’s challenge to the accomplice testimony is without merit, we affirm the judgment of conviction, but vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing with directions.
Comments on P. v. Meza CA2/2