legal news


Register | Forgot Password

J.H. v. Superior Court CA2/4
Mother J.H. (mother) filed a petition for extraordinary writ following the juvenile court’s termination of reunification services for mother and her two children, A.H., born in March 2010, and G.H., born in April 2012. Mother asserts that the court’s ruling under Welfare and Institutions Code, section 366.22, subdivision (a)(1) —that returning the children to mother’s custody would create a substantial risk of detriment to the safety, protection, or physical or emotional well-being of children—was not supported by substantial evidence. We find that the court’s decision was supported by substantial evidence, and therefore deny the writ petition on its merits and lift the stay entered on January 3, 2018.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale