In re D.R. CA6
Appellant A.R. (father) challenges a juvenile court restraining order protecting his two-year-old daughter, D.R. (the child). He claims that the juvenile court erred in granting the child’s request for a restraining order against him because she was already adequately protected by criminal protective orders protecting the child’s mother and by the juvenile court’s dispositional order requiring supervised visitation. We reject his claim and affirm the court’s order.
Comments on In re D.R. CA6