legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Noflin v. Volkswagen Group of America CA2/4
Appellant Bernice Noflin leased and later purchased a new 2009 Volkswagen Tiguan (vehicle) from defendant Volkswagen of Downtown L.A., L.P. (VW–DTLA). The vehicle was covered by a manufacturer’s standard new vehicle warranty. Between July 2008 and September 2014, Noflin experienced numerous mechanical and electrical problems with the vehicle and delivered it on 14 occasions to VW–DTLA for repair. By November 19, 2014, Noflin had decided the vehicle was a “lemon” and demanded that defendants Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. (Volkswagen) and VW–DTLA provide her a refund or replace the vehicle under the provisions of the Song–Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, Civil Code section 1790, et seq. (Song–Beverly Act, or the Act). By January 28, 2015, Volkswagen had extended three increasing offers to repurchase Noflin’s vehicle. None was accepted.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale