In re E.Z. CA2/6
M.Z. appeals from August 23 and 25, 2017 disposition orders entered after the juvenile court sustained a dependency petition and declared appellant’s 12-month-old son, E.Z. a ward of the court. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300, subds. (b) & (g).) Appellant contends, among other things, that the trial court erred in removing the child from her care, in granting the biological father a 35-day extended visit, and in ordering that the supervised visits take place in San Luis Obispo County. We affirm.
Comments on In re E.Z. CA2/6