In re J.S. CA2/8
Carlos S. (father) appeals from the juvenile court’s order terminating his parental rights as to his child J.S. Father claims the court did not comply with the requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) (ICWA) and its corresponding provisions under California law (see Welf. & Inst. Code, § 224 et seq.). As relevant here, those laws require juvenile courts to inquire whether a child in a dependency proceeding is an Indian child, and if so, to inform the tribe of which the child is a member. (See In re Isaiah W. (2016) 1 Cal.5th 1, 5 (Isaiah W.).) We affirm.
Comments on In re J.S. CA2/8