Marullo v. Nguyen CA3
Respondent Marc David Marullo obtained a domestic violence restraining order (DVRO) against pro. per. appellant Amy Nguyen, his former girlfriend, and the court denied Nguyen’s request for a DVRO against Marullo following a contested trial in which both Marullo and Nguyen testified. Nguyen appeals the order granting the DVRO against her. Marullo did not respond to the appeal.
Although difficult to discern from her opening brief, which does not include appropriate citations to the record or coherent legal authority, Nguyen contends the DVRO should be reversed because Marullo did not serve her with his petition and she was unaware he was seeking a DVRO against her at the time of trial. She also claims the court improperly described the job title of one of the witnesses that testified during trial, and that the attorney she eventually hired to represent her was not responsive.
We conclude the trial court did not err in granting the DVRO against Nguyen.
Comments on Marullo v. Nguyen CA3