legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Ranson
A jury convicted of first degree residential burglary. In a subsequent proceeding, the trial court found true allegations that defendant had been convicted of two serious felony prior offenses, each of which constituted a strike. The court sentenced Ranson to 18 years in prison. Defendant appeals, contending that his conviction must be reversed on three separate grounds: (i) the jury's verdict was not supported by substantial evidence; (ii) the prosecutor improperly vouched for the prosecution witnesses in closing argument; and (iii) Ranson received ineffective assistance of counsel. Court found defendant's contentions to be without merit. Judgment Affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale