legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Smith CA2/6
James Smith appeals from the judgment entered after a jury convicted him on nine counts of sexual offenses committed against five women - Jane Does 1 through 5. The offenses were two counts of forcible oral copulation (Pen. Code, § 288a, subd. (c)(2)(A)); one count of forcible sexual penetration by a foreign object (§ 289, subd. (a)(1)(A)); three counts of forcible rape (§ 261, subd. (a)(2)); one count of attempted forcible sodomy (§§ 664, 286, subd. (c)(2)(A)); one count of forcible sodomy (§ 286, subd. (c)(2)(A)); and one count of kidnapping for the purpose of committing oral copulation (§ 209, subd. (b)(1)). The jury found true allegations that appellant had kidnapped Jane Doe 1 (§ 667.61, subds. (a), (e)(1) & (4)); personally used a deadly weapon against Jane Does 2-5 (§ 667.61, subds. (a), (e)(3) & (4); and personally used a firearm in the commission of an offense against Jane Doe 3 (§ 12022.53, subd. (b)). The trial court sentenced appellant to prison for 150 years

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale