P. v. Sherman CA2/3
Defendants and appellants Raymond Sherman, Troy Hammock and Everett Allen were convicted of various crimes, including robbery, stemming from an after-hours takeover of a Nordstrom Rack during which 14 employees were held. Defendants appealed their convictions and contended, among other things, that the prosecutor committed misconduct by asking “were they lying” questions. Defendant Sherman, unlike the other defendants, was also convicted of forcible rape, forcible oral copulation and aggravated kidnapping, and he raised several contentions regarding those convictions. In an opinion filed on August 28, 2017, we rejected those and defendants’ other contentions regarding sentencing errors and affirmed the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Sherman CA2/3