Wells Fargo Bank v. Dalia CA2/8
Following an arbitration conducted pursuant to a mandatory arbitration clause in a business line of credit contract, a judgment in favor of Respondent Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) in the amount of $135,032.14 was entered against Appellant Anthony Dalia (“Dalia”).
On appeal, Dalia asserts that he did not agree to mandatory arbitration as part of the business line of credit contract.
We affirm.
Comments on Wells Fargo Bank v. Dalia CA2/8