In re D.C. CA1/1
K.S. (Mother), the mother of D.C. and L.C., appeals from the juvenile court’s order terminating her parental rights under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. Mother contends the juvenile court erred because (1) there was no substantial evidence D.C., a child over age 12, consented to adoption; (2) the court’s denial of a continuance of the section 366.26 hearing was an abuse of discretion; (3) the court failed to ascertain the wishes of D.C. and L.C. with respect to their placement; and (4) the court’s denial of Mother’s section 388 petition was an abuse of discretion. We reject each of these contentions and affirm.
Comments on In re D.C. CA1/1