Mohamed v. Attia CA4/1
Mohamed Attia (Attia) and Noram Mohamed (Mohamed) had been married for about four months when Mohamed sought a domestic violence restraining order preventing Attia from contacting her. (Fam. Code, § 6300.) Mohamed alleged both physical and verbal abuse, and sought a three-year order. After an evidentiary hearing, the court found Mohamed did not establish the claimed physical abuse. But the court found Mohamed met her burden to show Attia had verbally and emotionally abused her, and this abuse warranted a one-year protective order against Attia.
Attia challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the order, and contends the court committed evidentiary errors. We reject Attia's contentions and affirm.
Comments on Mohamed v. Attia CA4/1