Travel Advisory, S.A. de C.V. v. Superior Court CA
In this writ proceeding, petitioners Comercializadora Travel Advisory, S.A. de C.V. (Advisory), and a related company Holiday Club Management de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (Holiday; sometimes together Petitioners), challenge the trial court's denial of their motion to quash the service of summons and complaint of plaintiff and real party in interest Serge Nayshtut (Plaintiff). Petitioners, who are Mexican corporations, argue the undisputed facts demonstrate that California lacks jurisdiction over either of them to adjudicate Plaintiff's claims of breach of contract and misrepresentations concerning a timeshare membership agreement he entered into with Advisory in Mexico, for which Holiday provides customer service. (Code Civ. Proc., § 418.10; all further statutory references are to this code unless noted.)
Comments on Travel Advisory, S.A. de C.V. v. Superior Court CA