legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Paet CA6
Defendant Courtney Christine Paet pleaded no contest pursuant to a plea agreement to felony possession of heroin for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351), misdemeanor possession of clonazepam for sale (§ 11375, subd. (b)(1)), and misdemeanor possession of alprazolam without a prescription (§ 11375, subd. (b)(2)). The court suspended imposition of sentence and placed her on probation with numerous conditions.
On appeal, she challenges the court’s imposition of a search condition requiring her to submit to a warrantless search of “all cellular telephones in your possession or under your control, . . . any text messages, voice messages, call logs or [associated] photographs . . . .” Defendant contends that this condition was unconstitutionally overbroad because it impinged on her privacy. We conclude that the narrowly tailored cell phone search condition imposed by the trial court was not unconstitutionally overbroad, and we affirm the trial court’s probation order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale