P. v. Paet CA6
Defendant Courtney Christine Paet pleaded no contest pursuant to a plea agreement to felony possession of heroin for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351), misdemeanor possession of clonazepam for sale (§ 11375, subd. (b)(1)), and misdemeanor possession of alprazolam without a prescription (§ 11375, subd. (b)(2)). The court suspended imposition of sentence and placed her on probation with numerous conditions.
On appeal, she challenges the court’s imposition of a search condition requiring her to submit to a warrantless search of “all cellular telephones in your possession or under your control, . . . any text messages, voice messages, call logs or [associated] photographs . . . .” Defendant contends that this condition was unconstitutionally overbroad because it impinged on her privacy. We conclude that the narrowly tailored cell phone search condition imposed by the trial court was not unconstitutionally overbroad, and we affirm the trial court’s probation order.
Comments on P. v. Paet CA6