legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re J.O. CA1/1
R.M. (Mother) and L.J.O. (Father) appeal from an order terminating their parental rights to four of their children, J.O., I.O., L.O., and C.O. Mother also challenges the juvenile court’s order denying her Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petition to modify an order terminating her reunification services. Mother and Father allege the juvenile court lacked jurisdiction at the time it conducted the section 322.26 hearing, and the Contra Costa County Children & Family Services Bureau (Bureau) failed to provide adequate notice to comply with the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA; 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.). Mother further asserts the court erred by finding the children adoptable, declining to apply either the beneficial parent relationship or sibling relationship exceptions, and failing to consider the children’s wishes. We disagree and affirm the order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale