P. v. Edwards CA2/3
Defendant and appellant Eddie Lamar Edwards appeals his conviction for second degree robbery. He contends the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict, the trial court committed instructional errors, and the cumulative effect of the purported errors was prejudicial. The parties agree that the abstract of judgment should be amended to correctly reflect Edwards’s custody credits. We order the abstract of judgment corrected as the parties request, and otherwise affirm.
Comments on P. v. Edwards CA2/3