P. v. Woolford CA3
Defendant Daryl Ricky Woolford appeals from the trial court’s April 21, 2016 order terminating his mandatory supervision and imposing a prison sentence that had previously been stayed.
His claims on appeal concern the events surrounding the ultimate denial of his petitions for resentencing on his two crimes of conviction, pursuant to Penal Code section 1170.18. He first contends the trial court’s order allowing the withdrawal of his section 1170.18 petition to reduce and resentence on his burglary conviction--after the petition had been granted--was invalid. He next argues that subsequent orders denying reduction were in error, and that trial counsel was ineffective.
As we will explain, defendant’s challenges to the denial of his section 1170.18 petitions are not properly before this court and he raises no claim of error related to the April 21, 2016 judgment. Accordingly, we shall dismiss his appeal.
Comments on P. v. Woolford CA3