legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Hogan v. State Farm General Ins. Co. CA1/2
In 2000, Ronald and Victoria Hogan (the Hogans or plaintiffs) purchased a home on Gardenview Place in Santa Rosa. After discovering the developers and realtors had concealed material defects, they filed a complaint in 2002, seeking both rescission of the purchase agreement and legal damages. The rescission was confirmed in 2004 and, in 2007, the trial court entered judgment requiring the Hogans to return the property in exchange for consequential damages. In 2009, this court affirmed the judgment, confirming once and for all that the Hogans had, in 2002, effected a unilateral rescission which they were not free to revoke. (Hogan, et al. v. DeAngelis Construction, Inc., et al. (A117321, A118257, A120840, May 20, 2009) [nonpub. opn.] (Hogan I).) That decision was final on August 31, 2009.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale