In re C.G. CA1/3
Minor C.G., a ward of the court, appeals following a juvenile adjudication that he committed the crime of attempted second degree robbery. He raises a single issue on appeal. C.G. argues that juvenile court limitations on his cross-examination of the victim and an investigating police officer violated his confrontation rights secured by the sixth amendment. We conclude that any possible constitutional error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. The adjudication of the juvenile court is affirmed.
Comments on In re C.G. CA1/3