legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re M.H. CA4/1
This is a second appeal by T.G., who challenges the 2017 juvenile court judgment terminating her parental rights to M.H. and selecting adoption as his permanent plan. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26; all further statutory references are to this code unless noted.) A previous similar judgment was reversed in a nonpublished opinion, on T.G.'s appeal of the November 2016 parental rights termination order and permanent plan of adoption. (In re M.H. (May 24, 2017, D071503) [nonpub. opn.] [our prior opinion].) This court concluded that the previous finding was unsupported by substantial evidence, on likelihood of adoption within a reasonable time, in light of the thrust of the reports and assessments prepared by respondent San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency (Agency). We accordingly reversed the judgment terminating parental rights and its related finding that the parent-child beneficial relationship exception did not apply.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale